[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”4.16″ global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”4.16″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.19.1″ global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
Gone are the days when non-profit organizations could tackle a social cause on their own.\u00a0The individual approach to solving issues results in limited or isolated impact. Pre-pandemic, work had already begun in the non-profit sector to work collaboratively to address determinants of health and other complex social issues that no one organization could address on their own. Strong leaders were recognising that the issues at hand were bigger, messier, and spanned many boundaries. Our experience with Covid 19 accelerated the need for a collective response.<\/p>\n
So what is Collective Impact?<\/strong><\/p>\n Collective Impact occurs when a group of organizations come together with intention to address a social issue that is too complicated to be solved by any one group. Seems simple, right? But we know our system has not been set up to do this easily or well. Right now:<\/p>\n So what does this mean for designing a collective response?<\/strong><\/p>\n Kania and Kramer in Collective Impact (Stanford Social Impact Review, Winter 2011) has identified 5 pillars to successfully tackling big social issues.<\/p>\n 1. The first is a common agenda.<\/strong> To be effective the partner organizations need to come together to define a shared vision for the future. A shared vision helps everyone involved in the initiative see where it is going. When there are process challenges the vision helps people remember what is at stake.<\/p>\n 2. Shared measurement systems.<\/strong> Shared measures ensure all stakeholders have outputs and outcomes that can be measured across each organization. The increase in digital tools has made the ability to do shared measurement easier. An evaluation plan with simple, common measures is the starting point. As is addressing up-front concerns in the context of multi-stakeholder arrangements.<\/p>\n 3. Mutually reinforcing activities.<\/strong> Collectively the partners determine what activities will be performed by which organization and how they will be coordinated to benefit the initiative. Each organization may or may not do the same activities. For instance, in the case of a human service initiative each agency may focus on serving specific parts of the population. Or, one organization may lead the shared measurement while others carry out direct service.<\/p>\n 4. Continuous communication.<\/strong> Partners need to spend enough time together to develop trust, a common vocabulary and clarity of vision and approach. Spending time together will support trust and reciprocity. Developing agreements around how decisions will be made and differences will be addressed is critical. Over time these ways of working together need to be reinforced.<\/p>\n 5. Backbone support.<\/strong> Boundary spanning initiatives need to have backbone support. This means whether the structure be in a separate organization or in a secretariat or other coordinating body the whole initiative is supported through planning, coordination, and administration. Kania and Kramer recommend (2011) recommend this be a separate organization however, depending on the scope of the initiative creative ways of ensuring backboard support should be in place.<\/p>\n What does this mean for today\u2019 leaders?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n